|
UPDATE Concluding a nation-wide series
of awareness workshops on the civil and criminal procedure
code (CCPC) for DYT and GYT members judiciary officials
looked back this week at monumental changes in the evolving
judiciary system in Bhutan.
The administration of justice in Bhutan
had been greatly strengthened and an efficient and dynamic
legal system established in the country since His Majesty
the King ascended the Golden Throne in 1974, said the
chief justice of Bhutan, Lyonpo Sonam Tobgye. His Majesty
had inspired far-reaching legislative and judicial reforms
to respond to the changing needs of a changing society.
The Civil and Criminal
Procedure Code
The CCPC, which
applies to all civil and criminal cases, states that
everyone is equal before the law. The code grants equal
and effective protection of the law to all Bhutanese
without discrimination on the grounds of race, colour,
sex, language, religion, political or other opinion,
national or social origin, property, birth or other
status.
According to the code, citizens should be tried by ordinary
courts of law and not by ad hoc tribunals.
The supreme court sits at the apex of the court structure
and the jurisdiction and powers of all the courts are
clearly specified.
The code defines the role and professional conduct of
jabmis, explains appeal and review procedures and points
out what would constitute contempt of court and other
associated offences.
The code outlines arrest procedures which forbid arbitrary
arrests and the subjection of accused to torture, cruelty,
and inhumane or degrading treatment and punishment.
The code empowers Bhutanese courts to issue arrest and
search warrants and specifies circumstances under which
arrests may be carried out without warrant.
The code allows search of mail "if there is reasonable
cause to suspect that a mail or parcel contains"
material or information "harmful to public health
or security". It also permits wiretapping if authorized
by a warrant of the court.
The code states that an arrested person should be informed
of the charges for which he or she is arrested immediately
after the arrest. Statements by suspects to the police
should be voluntary and interrogation of suspects would
be permitted only after the person charged is informed
of his or her right to consult a jabmi or legal counsel.
Any person arrested or detained for criminal offences
with or without warrant should be produced before a
court within 24 hours of the arrest and the court should
conduct "preliminary hearing" of the case
within ten days of registering it. Civil cases should
be brought before the judge within 72 hours.
The code also outlines the procedures for "plea
of guilty", plea bargains, bail and bond, withdrawal
from prosecution, sentencing, and procedures related
to the arrest, charges and conviction of juveniles.
"The judiciary of Bhutan has witnessed unprecedented
development, guided by the wisdom and vision of His
Majesty the King," the chief justice said, adding
that this vision would continue to refine the legal
system, long into the future, to enhance greater transparency
and strengthen the Rule of Law for the well being of
all Bhutanese for all time to come.
The chief justice said that His Majesty had repeatedly
advised judicial officials "to dispense justice
as speedily as possible, to adhere to the rule of law,
and to make the judicial process clear".
In 1985, His Majesty had created the
post of the chief justice. Subsequently efficient drangpons
were appointed, the post of thrim-tshap (acting drangpon)
was abolished, and financial and administrative powers
were decentralized from the High Court to the dzongkhag
and dungkhag courts.
To build the capacity of the judiciary
and to safeguard its independence, a separate judicial
cadre, distinct from the civil service cadre, was established
in 1990. In 1991, formal legal education was initiated
when the first group of graduates went to study law
in India. A research division was established in 1994.
On royal command, the national legal
course was started in 1995 on Bhutanese and international
law as well as on Buddhist literature. "Consequently
we were able to improve the quality and delivery of
justice," the chief justice said. "The course
not only proved popular but also very effective and
our new breed of lawyers are conversant both in English
and in Dzongkha, not only at the working level but at
a higher and deeper level."
Also in 1995, the High Court introduced
formal training for jabmis (legal counsel) upon the
advice of His Majesty the King. Since then about 160
of them were trained.
In 1999, the Office of Legal Affairs
was established.
Computers were introduced in the courtroom
to provide information for analysis, to expedite the
drafting of judgments and to implement the objectives
of justice, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Computerized
information in court cases helped retrieve precedents
rapidly and accurately, thereby enhancing a uniform
sentencing system.
The chief justice told Kuensel that legal education
and dissemination was also given stronger emphasis.
"Justice is not only adjudication
but knowing the process," Lyonpo Sonam Tobgye said.
"We need to create awareness on the rule of law,
element of fair trial, and the necessity of due process
of law to ensure that justice is understood and implemented.
We need to disseminate legal education to the grassroots."
The chief justice said that although
His Majesty the King had introduced numerous reforms
since enthronement, 1988 marked the watershed of reforms.
That year His Majesty had issued a
kaja instructing the formation of a high level commission
to look into the deficiencies of the judicial system.
"In the kaja His Majesty expressed
his deep concern about the delay of justice, about the
quality of justice, and about the confidence of the
people in the judicial system," said Lyonpo Sonam
Tobgye. "Justice was terribly delayed. That was
because the system then was based primarily on the experiences
of our forefathers. The system had to be reformed to
adapt to the changing nature and increasing number of
litigation."
The CCPC workshop
Around 1,250 DYT and GYT members who included gups,
chimis, mangmis and geog clerks "benefited"
from the orientation workshop on the CCPC in the 20
dzongkhags, which wrapped up amidst a solemn and symbolic
traditional ceremony in Wangduephodrang this week.
Her Royal Highness Ashi Sonam Dechan Wangchuck, who
opened the first workshop in Punakha in August 2001,
presided over the closing ceremony in Wangduephodrang
as the chief guest. Participants received certificates
from Her Royal Highness who also inaugurated the new
district court house.
Judiciary officials told Kuensel that the workshop had
a "two-fold" purpose.
"Our main objective was to inform the people about
their rights, and at the same time, their duties,"
said ramjam Lungten Drubjur of the royal court of justice.
Participants in Wangduephodrang believed that the benefits
of the workshop would transcend "time and mental
boundaries".
"It will transform people's thinking totally,"
gup Bago of Rubi geog told Kuensel. "Earlier we
did not know there were laws let alone understand or
interpret them." Tenzin from Jala village said
that the code summed up all laws in the country. "You
are a wise man if you know even a fraction of this code."
Even as farmers waxed eloquent about their legal rights
and duties the irony, however, was that the country's
elite citizenry – the capital's population – generally
appeared to be in the dark about it.
Residents in the capital whom Kuensel interviewed at
random did not know there was a civil and criminal procedure
code. A few had "vaguely" heard some people
mentioning it.
"The High Court should hold some workshops here
in the capital as well," a civil servant said.
"I don't think it serves their purpose if the supposedly
finest brains in the country think that CCPC are just
four letters of the English alphabet."
"While the essence and the principles of justice
would always remain the same, justice should move with
the currents of social and technological changes,"
the chief justice said. "We have to complement
the rising expectations of the people. We must keep
upgrading and updating professionalism in the judiciary."
The enactment of the CCPC in 2001 was the most crucial
and siginificant reform the judiciary had initiated
so far. Through this code, there was improved accessibility
to justice and the courts had become "user friendly".
The CCPC, among other things, had streamlined
the registration procedure and hearing processes. It
upheld the principle of the due process of law. With
the code, the judiciary had now become transparent.
"With transparency judges become
accountable, and litigants become responsible,"
the chief justice said. "The code ensures that
the end does not justify the means. For justice, the
means are equally important."
Lyonpo Sonam Tobgye said that the historical
element incorporated in the CCPC made it a unique legal
instrument. It had retained the traditional beliefs
and customs which had been part of Bhutanese social
and cultural life since the time of the Zhabdrung and
which were drawn from the fundamental teachings of Buddhism
encompassing both spiritual and worldly laws.
The chief justice pointed out that
today there were 60 lawyers in the country and 30 more
were undergoing studies in law at prestigious universities
in India and abroad.
In addition, eight lawyers had completed
their Masters in Law (LLM) degrees and were working
as ramjams. Two were currently pursuing their LLM studies
and more would be sent for advanced postgraduate courses
in the near future.
"Studying law has become so popular
today," the chief justice said. "This is very
gratifying because this is an express recognition of
the necessity for the rule of law."
Since 1997, more than 100 bench clerks
had been trained and were already working in the courts.
Around 40 bench clerks would soon join the judiciary.
The reforms and the development in
the judiciary had brought about noticeable improvements
in the dispensation and administration of justice.
In 2001, 6,079 cases were decided in
108 days whereas only 1,951 cases took more than 108
days. The dzongkhag courts had decided a total of 11,260
cases. Only 109 cases decided by the dzongkhag courts
appealed to the High Court and out of 110 cases decided
by the High Court, only 18 appealed to His Majesty the
King. The percentage of appeal in 2001 was 1.13.
Despite the progress, the chief justice
said that there were still "loud" dissenting
views. "Some of the opinions expressed in the recent
National Assembly reminded the judiciary, particularly
the judges, that we have to work harder to gain people's
confidence in the process of administering justice and
in our professional conduct."
In future the royal court of justice
planned to develop a court website for information and
transparency, and to make judgments accessible to everyone
all around the country within minutes of delivery. Through
the website, transcripts of arguments would also be
available.
Infrastructure development would be
given particular emphasis in the future. Future court
houses and buildings would be "independently located
and inspiring structures" reflecting the rich architectural
tradition of Bhutan. The construction of the new High
Court building was already in progress.
The royal court of justice was also
considering the establishment of a formal judges' training
institute so that judges could update their knowledge
frequently within the country.
|